<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nina Nitzsche on JAVAPRO International</title><link>https://javapro-en.svenruppert.com/authors/nina-nitzsche/</link><description>Recent content in Nina Nitzsche on JAVAPRO International</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 09:03:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://javapro-en.svenruppert.com/authors/nina-nitzsche/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Agile Nightmares - When Agile Methods Become an Innovation Barrier</title><link>https://javapro-en.svenruppert.com/agile-nightmares-when-agile-methods-become-an-innovation-barrier/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 09:03:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://javapro-en.svenruppert.com/agile-nightmares-when-agile-methods-become-an-innovation-barrier/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-scary-figures-of-agility"&gt;The Scary Figures of Agility&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the dynamic world of software development and beyond, agility has established itself as a&lt;br&gt;
defining approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, behind the promise of flexibility, customer orientation, and continuous improvement, pitfalls sometimes lurk. Calls are increasing to declare agility as ineffective or even &amp;lsquo;dead&amp;rsquo;. The real reasons for this growing scepticism, however, rarely lie in the agile principles themselves, but rather in their creeping or even deliberate misinterpretation and application.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>